Vendor Reviews
Purpose: A dedicated space for community members to share experience-based reviews of vendors—focused on factual representation rather than promotion, linking to products, or transactional facilitation.
What is Encouraged
-
Factual user reports: delivery times, sample quality, chemistry details like purity tests, neutral reputational commentary.
- Example: “Ordered from Vendor X: arrived in 10 days; reagent tests showed 98% purity.”
-
Reversible, signed off experiences: ensure all statements are first-person and experience-based.
-
Vendor names may be mentioned, as user-generated content is protected under Section 230—so long as you remain a neutral intermediary, not the publisher of affiliate content. (SourceForge, Congress.gov)
What Must Not Be Allowed
-
No promotional language or sales facilitation: avoid direct purchase links, affiliate or coupon codes, or instructions for buying.
-
No organizing group buys or coordinating purchases.
-
Editorial scam ratings or “definitive” list-making without attributing claims to user reports and offering vendor response or appeal. Platform declarations of vendor wrongdoing may invalidate § 230 protections and raise defamation risk. (Congress.gov, everythingpolicy.org)
Guidelines Overview
| Allowed | Prohibited |
|---|---|
| First-person vendor review with neutral tone | Embedded links to purchase pages |
| Shipping, packaging, purity experience | Payment info, methods, or organizing purchases |
| Attributed quotes from other users | Declarations stating “Vendor X is a scam”—unless clearly user-claimed, with appeal options |
Moderation Policies & Protections
-
User-generated links: permitted when describing personal experience; offensiveness or promotional spam may be moderated.
-
“Scam vendor” posts: allowed if based strictly on user reports, attributed accurately, and disclaimers are present. Encourage vendor appeals or follow-up statements.
-
Moderation is in good faith: enforce rules based on clear guidelines, consistently documented. Doing so supports safe harbor under both § 230(c)(1) and § 230(c)(2) for good-faith takedowns. (Dynamis LLP, FasterCapital, innovation.consumerreports.org, JD Supra, Congress.gov)
Best Practices for Reviewers
-
Speak from personal experience: avoid posting hearsay or unverified speculation.
-
Include purity data or reagent results where available.
-
Disclaim any medical, legal, or chemical advice.
-
Do not embed purchase links or encourage contact.
-
Respect intellectual property—don’t post copyrighted materials without permission. (The Insurance Universe)